
Home
We Are Forty
Overview |
Career
Clubs International Reprint: We Are Forty
Chapter VII "Acres of Diamonds in the Home Field"
Prelim |
1 | 2 |
3 | 4 |
5 | 6 |
7 | 8 |
9 | 10 |
11 | 12 |
Comment
Not recommended reading. Takes a long time to
illustrate how their Job Formula can be applied to housekeeping/homecare
field of work. |
p. 133 |
|
CHAPTER VII
Acres of Diamonds in the Home Field
If you detest and despise
housework, this chapter
is not for you! But if, like us, you get a lift from
turning a
storm-tossed room into a haven of evened
shades, dusted tables and
inviting chairs; if, like us, you hover
tenderly over the crust of an apple
pie or the crispness of young, fried chicken; if, like
us, you know no perfume more
delightful than the fresh
aroma of sun dried linens—then you will not
want to miss a word of what we are
about to say. For you it may
hold a real gleam of opportunity. For
there is an enormous field where jobs are still to be had for the proper
asking. And the only required experience is the one of daily living.
We refer to jobs in the
home—that green pasture on which our eyes had been turned from the
beginning. Every
time we picked up a newspaper
and opened it at the Help Wanted section, there
it was before us, big in
the news. Wanted—house-… |
|
|
p. 134 |
|
keeper by business
couple. Wanted—woman
to take
entire charge of motherless home. Wanted—
companion-nurse for two children. Wanted—
chauffeur.
Wanted—handy
man. Wanted—wanted
wanted—wanted! Business might be
cutting down right and left. Business
might be laying off hands by
the thousand. But the home fires still had to be
kept burning, and there were plenty of SOS calls
all along the path of our trips to
help tend them.
Of course, these were
not white collar jobs. They
might not be of the
type that would step you up
socially, but
definitely they need not step you
down. The whole
situation would be up to you.
If you handled your
position with the dignity with
which you would handle
any other job that required
responsibility and capability, you would be
accorded the respect
that you merited, and there would be
no losing of face at all. And the advantages of these jobs in the home are striking in comparison with many
office jobs that apparently pay
more. Living expenses are almost
always taken care of; no room rent, no money for meals, less
money for clothes certainly, no
carfare to and from work. Barring any small personal expenses, a
person can save every cent he makes.
Our ideas were not
original by any means. We… |
|
|
p. 135 |
|
personally
knew several women who used to manage
their own homes and who now were just as competently
managing homes for other people. Also,
we had been hearing
these positions advocated in
some of the office
employment agencies. Every
little
while, as we were trying to get
various jobs, some helpful agency man or woman would say: "Why
don't you go out on your own and try for a
housekeeping job? That pays all right
when your living expenses are
taken into account." Or: "I should think you could do very well,
managing a home for a business
couple." Or: "What about positions where parents want their growing children
to be associated with the nicer type
of person? Had you ever thought of taking some kind of job with
children?"
As a matter of fact, we had. Back in our
minds, we had long held both these
fields—home care and child care—in reserve as a nest egg in time of need.
Actually, we have always thought
that it takes as much skill to
run a home as it does to run a typewriter, and that balancing the
family budget is as technical as balancing books. As for
children, we prided ourselves on our
ability to get along with them and to win their liking.
We stepped right into
the newspaper columns… |
|
|
p. 136 |
|
and began to answer
the ads and all through our
trips, wherever we
were, we kept on answering
them. There were any
number under the headings
of:
housekeeper
companion
practical nurse
child care
Then occasionally there
would be specials, such as
a call for a cook in a small institution, or chauffeur-companion,
or house mother for some students'
home. Reading them, we
were astonished by the
many outlets offered. It was as if any and every talent
that had been developed in the domestic arts
now could be turned into money.
Nor were we for a moment underestimating the
requirements in the home field. We had listed at
the very start of our job campaign—each of us, and
independently—in our employable characteristics:
managing home; good cook, like to plan meals; a
knack in handling children.
Certainly this field was
no place for the person whose home—except when
company was imminent—looked as if it had been
in the wake of a tornado; or whose children were
never happier than when visiting the neighbors. |
|
|
p. 137 |
|
But we felt that we could
qualify—and so we proceeded
to find out.
Within the space of a few
days, and in a single
Pennsylvania city not
far from Philadelphia, there
was a flock of
housekeepings ads in the local newspaper,
and many of them sounded interesting.
HOUSEKEEPER—white,
between 30 and 45. Good home and all
conveniences. 2 adults. State salary and telephone.
P. O.
Box 9876.
HOUSEKEEPER-for
motherless home. 3 children,
school age. Good salary. Write full details. Z
HOUSEKEEPER-settled
type for elderly man. Plain
cooking. Weekends free. Good salary, good home for
right person.
Phone: ABC 1096.
HOUSEKEEPER—full charge business couple.
Experienced. Sleep in. $10-$12 a
week. Telephone: DEF 1987.
HOUSEKEEPER—capable taking charge of large
rooming house. No cooking.
References. Call before
noon.
400 Main Street.
HOUSEKEEPER—who prefers
good home to high wages, 2 in family.
General and cooking. All conveniences. Five
room house. Telephone:
York
16.
HOUSEKEEPER—middle aged
to take charge of country
house, all marketing, servants, etc. Permanent position to
right person. Give full
information in first letter. Excellent salary. Write XYZ.
HOUSEKEEPER—good cook,
good planner and buyer.
3 in family. High standard required. Woman selected will
have
room, bath, occasional
use of car. $16 a week. Do not
answer this ad unless you
can qualify. Write MN.
HOUSEKEEPER-for 3 small
apartments. Experienced
only. State salary and references.
500 Market St. |
|
|
p. 138 |
|
The first ad we
answered read as follows:
HOUSEKEEPER-CHAUFFEUR. For
elderly woman, one in family. Full
charge. Good salary. References. Write
to
P. O. Box 0987.
We had no way of judging
how many persons
would answer the ad, but we knew that if our answer
were to stand out and get consideration, it
had to be somewhat above
the average run. And if that were to be
true, it only could be because we
were offering a better buy to that elderly woman, or made her see that
we understood exactly what she
needed, and that we ourselves could fill that
need.
We felt that she might
receive many letters that
said in effect:
Am good housekeeper, drive car well. Have had
so many years experience. Left last
job so many months ago for
this reason. Can offer these good references.
But the ad had said that
she was an elderly woman —and alone. Would not that present some sort of
picture toward
which our letter could tend? We thought that it did, and so we wrote:
housekeeeper—If
your home is the size that one woman
can handle, and you like it kept like a new silver dollar—here
is your woman. I really enjoy housework and could easily cater to
all your tastes. And if you happen to
enjoy company, I can have your meals as festive as you
please. |
|
|
p. 139 |
|
chauffeur—I have
driven a car almost as long as there
have been automobiles. I have driven for a sick boy who
was terrified of
accidents, but who enjoyed our drives.
And I have also driven
for a woman who was always in a
hurry, and I satisfied her. What I am trying to say,
is that 1 feel almost certain I can
suit you.
Evidently our attempt at
winning her with a personal touch
pleased her, for our letter won an interview and then the job.
Another advertisement
stopped us because it
mentioned one of our especial weaknesses, dogs.
It read:
woman—over 30, to attend elderly woman with dog.
Permanent position. Share
housework. Telephone: LM
456.
A job like that seemed
right down our alley so
we planned certain points that we might make in
the telephone
conversation. We could quite truthfully
say that we loved dogs, but that in itself
was not too convincing. So we worked out some
thoughts that we hoped carried a
little warmth, and originality,
too. To make sure that the conversation would proceed as tellingly as possible, we
made notes before lifting the
receiver. Of course, the
opening sentence had to be routine in order to
identify ourself with the
advertisement. We began:… |
|
|
p. 140 |
|
I am calling about the advertisement in the morning
paper. Are you the lady
who advertised?
She said that she was,
and we continued:
As soon as I saw your ad, I knew that I would like to
have the chance to work for you. Do you
mind my saying that that word dog
in your advertisement certainly won
my heart?
She asked if we liked
dogs, too. We replied:
I certainly do! Not being able to have a dog
is one of the real drawbacks about
living in a small apartment. I look
longingly at every dog I see in the
street.
The conversation was off to a running start. She said that
Casey was an Irish setter, and she wanted
to know if we were good and strong because he
pulled hard on the leash.
He was a valuable dog, she explained,
and she had had him since he was a
puppy. She was always afraid that Casey would
pull away and get run over, and if
anything happened to that dog
it would break her heart.
We eagerly assured her that we could handle
Casey, and that while he
was in our care he would never get away.
We went on:
While you are sizing me up to see how I would do,
why not see what Casey
thinks, too?
She laughed and said that she could see that we
understood how an old
woman felt about her dog. |
|
|
p. 141 |
|
In a subsequent interview our whole hearted interest
in Casey completely clinched the job. The fact
that we found we would be expected
to sleep in gave us a very graceful reason for not accepting.
In trying for jobs as companion we
followed the same system in our applications. There was one ad that read:
COMPANION— 35 to 40. To two elderly sisters. Six days
a week, Sundays off. No housework. Give
phone number and salary expected.
A-765
This was a position advertised in a large
Maryland
city where we were job hunting for several days.
Our reply letter read:
A-765
Dear Ladies:
I wonder if your advertisement was not addressed just
to me. For I was trained the way
southern girls used to be trained— in
the social arts rather than in any practical
business way. I converse easily,
read well, play the piano, and
can manage a household if called upon.
From your advertisement, I gather that you desire a
person of some
discrimination. I believe I can qualify.
But after satisfying you
as to my references and background,
I will never bore you about the better days that
I have seen.
As I cannot exactly tell what my duties would be, I do
not know what
salary to ask. Anyway, I should prefer to
be guided by what you
consider fair. |
|
|
p. 142 |
|
The Southern background
happened to be genuine, for one of us hailed from the South—and we
tried to couch our letter
in true Southern mood.
The following day we were
invited for an interview. We found an interesting situation. In this
rather large house,
apparently well manned by
servants, lived twin
sisters. They were tall, slim,
aristocratic, and probably somewhere between
sixty-five and
seventy-five years old. They possessed
a lively wit, wanted to be read to, talked to and entertained
in any way a companion could devise.
But the extra touch was the fact
that, because of some unknown
feud, they had not been on speaking terms for years. Their medium of communication had been a
companion who had recently died. The
aloof connivance that had contrived the ad, we shall never know.
But apparently they had been
attracted to our letter because we seemed to realize
their needs.
Sitting on a settee in
the big old fashioned parlor, with one sister in the dim recesses of one corner
and the other a
stiff figure in a petit-point chair
over by the window, we
made a new version of the
eternal triangle. The point about the interview
was that both sisters, in
different words and at different
times, said that they had thought of adver-… |
|
|
p. 143 |
|
tising for a young person in order to have
some life in the house, and then
hesitated because they did not want a lot of young people eternally
traipsing in and out. But that
they felt that we would suit
because we had some gumption about us and were
not the whining type.
It was the formula working
again. These two women wanted a touch
of life, and the person who got that
companion job had to bring to this market what the buyers were
looking for. In fact, we found that often three of the main
prerequisites in a companion—judging from the jobs we followed up—
were the optimistic viewpoint, the
look of health, and a happy disposition.
There was the gentleman in
the suburbs of an
upstate
Pennsylvania city where
we remained over
night. He advertised a position that would justly
appeal to any out-of-job
secretary. The advertisement read:
COMPANION and typist.
Mature woman to take care
of correspondence for a gentleman who has retired, and
to act as companion.
Hours 9 to 5:30. Lunch given. Write
full particulars to DEF
432.
We mailed a neatly
blocked, attractive looking
letter that would not only give our qualifications… |
|
|
p. 144 |
|
but at the same time
be the outward proof of our
ability as a typist.
We said in the answer:
I believe that I can
qualify for the position you advertised
in Sunday's paper.
As a companion, I could
be useful in many ways—read
to you the daily newspapers, or books, or magazines. If
card games interest
you, I know several good ones that
play well with two or
more persons. And of course, if you
care for walks or drives, I would take every precaution to
see that you were
comfortable and enjoyed them.
I type rapidly and have
little difficulty in expressing
myself in letters. I mean, that if you wanted me to,
I could answer
most of your mail with just enough help
from you to get your thoughts in the matter.
In the interview that
resulted, we found that the
man and his wife were
the entire family. The man was perhaps fifteen years older than his
wife, and rather feeble. She led a very active social and club
existence, which kept her away from the house a
greater part of every
day. In the evening, the couple
sometimes dined with friends, or had friends in
to dinner. The man's
days had become long and
dull, and his ad was
the first effort to give a little
more interest to them.
The position—which we
could have had—paid
twelve dollars a week.
His memorable reply paid
tribute to any care
and thought put into a letter.
He said:… |
|
|
p. 145 |
|
I hardly knew what I wanted in a companion until your
letter began to define it.
Then it seemed to me that it
would be very pleasant to
have definite times for good
leading, for games, and so on.
For so long I have been
accustomed to a full working
day, that now that I am retired, time seems to hang rather
heavy on my hands.
But a routine of amusing things to
do would be something to try.
That was a good letter.
But it was merely the sort of letter that
anyone would write who was trying to
think how he could fit into that companion job so that the
advertiser would say: "There's the man
I want!" Or: "That is the
very woman who would suit me!"
Another position that came through an advertisement
in a newspaper in a small town in
Delaware had to be
answered by telephone. The advertisement
read:
TEMPORARY COMPANION to
convalescent woman.
About 40, pleasant appearance and manner. Some experience
with the sick. Telephone for appointment. R-642.
We telephoned and
identified ourselves as replying
to the newspaper
advertisement. We had already
determined not only
the wording of our message, but also a definite point about the voice.
Since the advertisement concerned a convalescent, we were
going to speak in as
clear and restful a tone as pos-… |
|
|
p. 146 |
|
sible. As soon as the connection was made, there was a short pause and
then someone said to us:
"Hold the wire a moment,
please."
We did, and presently
another voice answered.
We again gave our reason
for calling, and continued:
I believe that the sick
person would find that I suited
her. I have spent a great
deal of time with sick people,
and I enjoy making them
comfortable, and entertaining
them.
"I am the sick person,"
was the reply. "I am very
nervous just now, but
your voice sounds soothing.
I should like to see you.
So many times over the
phone I cannot understand what people are saying.
But I understood you right away."
She proved to be a woman
who had been in a serious motor accident, and was quite nervous as a
result. The person
she needed had to be a calm, serene, competent individual. And any
feeling of hurry
or confusion or rush would have barred an
applicant automatically.
Our manner of speaking
over the telephone was the first big point in our
favor. But again—what
sort of person would an ill
woman be likely to want?
All we did was to try to fill the bill. But that was enough to win that
job. |
|
|
p. 147 |
|
Child care offered a
number of interesting positions in every city that we visited. Ads read:
CHILD'S NURSE-complete
charge of 7 year old girl.
Good character, refined, dependable. State wages and experience. Write ABC.
CHILDREN'S NURSE-35 to 45.
Must like children.
Care of three, between ages of 5 to 11. Servant type need
not apply. $12 a week.
Sleep in. Tel.: 482.
WOMAN ELDERLY to take care of child while
parents work. Best references, must be
fond of children. Sleep in or
out. No household duties. Write full details to
P. O.
Box 345.
NURSE-COMPANION 30 to 45.
Educated, prepared to
take charge of four children in grades. Willing to travel.
Good position to right
person. $60 a month. Telephone
for appointment: North
975.
CHILD'S NURSE—complete charge of 1 and 3 year
old. Refined, pleasant with children.
Sleep in. $30 a month. Mountains in summer. References. 1-234.
MOTHER'S HELPER-any age.
Good home, light housework. Two
children. $8 a week. References. Call mornings
before 11.
1200 Main Street.
MOTHER'S HELPER. Refined
type. One child, 6. Care of your room
and child's room. Sleep in. References and salary expected. P. O. Box
234.
WOMAN to take full charge
of twin girls, 3. No housework, not servant type. Free to travel. Must
like children. References. Telephone
Bell 3000.
We applied for several
such positions and got them. In every
one of the applications, we stressed
our liking for children. But we did not make the
statement in so many words. "I am fond of chil-… |
|
|
p. 148 |
|
dren" is a phrase on so many lips whose owners
are anything but fond, that it
has come to be almost meaningless. In our letters and telephone calls we
tried to convey by example how we felt about children.
What could we say? Well, here were some of the expressions:
I cared for little Jean
for three years. When I first knew
her, she was such a timid
little thing. But I taught her not to be afraid of the dark, or of dogs,
or of noise. She is a
lovely little girl, and I
hated to see her parents move
away.
Or:
Your two children at 1 and
3 are at a most interesting
age. Just ready to learn
all sorts of nice little company
manners, and to pick up
some of the games that I save for the babies. We ought to have a great
time together.
Or:
Your two youngsters at 7
and 9 are old enough to take
some good hikes. There are so many things about the
woods and the
country that children of that age love to
learn. Once two child friends and myself tamed a baby
squirrel—but we were
located in the country, where the
little animal was not
under foot.
The experience with
children is just as authentic whether it comes from your own children, your
nieces or your nephews,
or from an actual child
care position. |
|
| |
p. 149 |
|
The point, as we saw it,
was to give an idea about
the way we handled children. This would convey our success with them much
better than a series of
statements. In fact, pictures are always more convincing
than drab facts.
In practical
nursing—which was another excellent outlet in the home field for the
older woman— we took the same attitude. For whom was the nurse expected
to care—a convalescent, an invalid man,
an invalid woman, a crippled child, an elderly person,
someone who was bedfast, an ailing mother
with several small children? A person otherwise
vigorous but who was partly paralyzed, a person in
fair health who had a chronic
disease, an aged member of the
family who needed someone around
so that the younger people could be
free to come and go? Certainly
the same letter could not have been written in answer to all these
advertisements which we saw within a few short weeks. But the
right letter did not seem to us so very difficult, once
there was a clear understanding of
the requirements in each case.
For instance, what the
ailing mother probably
needed was someone with ability and character and
responsibility who could
take right over and let her
have the mental and
physical rest necessary to recov-… |
|
| |
p. 150 |
|
ery. For the crippled
child a strong, sensible, sane
person who could take the deformity casually and
make the child's life as
full as possible and as nearly
like normal children's.
For the partial paralytic,
the need was probably for someone who was resourceful and
entertaining, as well as vigorous and.
pleasant and intelligently optimistic. On the bad
days, that paralyzed
individual would certainly not
want any Pollyanna
around, but he would be very glad to
have some person who had the sense to understand,
and not to take his repinings too seriously.
We pounded this spirit
into these letters, and
were able to put ourselves across. Indeed, so long
as we kept before us the thought: "What does
he— or she—need?" And: "How can I
supply that need?" we were not
likely to get far off the track.
In getting the jobs in
the home field, we were not
unmindful of the fact that there were likewise a goodly
number of positions for men in this same
line-up. Of course, we could do no more than read
them in the
advertisements—chauffeur, house man, gardener, handy man,
chauffeur-companion, chauffeur-secretary,
chauffeur-houseman, and so on. But we
did have a thought in this connection. If we were
men, and very much up against it, we
should proba-… |
|
| |
p. 151 |
|
bly try for one of those
very jobs. And if our position
in the community and the type of permanent job
that we expected to get
again were of such a nature that this
sort of job would do our chances no good,
then we would be quite canny about
it. We would go after the home
job, all right, but it would definitely
not be in our own community. And if our
fellow townsmen thought we were vacationing in
Florida, or cooking up
some good proposition in
another city, who were we
to disabuse their minds?
Certainly we found the
household jobs the easiest of all to
get. And so far as we are concerned, we
are going to tuck away what we learned about getting
them, and hold it for a rainy day. |
|